Archive for the ‘Public Economics’ Category

-Action: education is the Thing in People

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

-Action: education is the Thing in People

The so-called "Employment is the Thing in People", this sentence is wrong at least a half, even said to be ignorant.

Although generally, national income is created by labor, increase employment is to increase the national income, however, to distinguish between two situations: First, under the simple labor employment growth, the second is under complex labor employment growth. The former achievements of the national income growth, even in the period of rapid population growth is very limited because of high population growth rate of 2%, however, only 0.5% in the domestic stage; the latter achievement of the national income growth, even in the population annual growth less than 0.2% even under low employment can still achieve a higher level.

Simple distinction between labor and labor complicated, of course, reflected in the labor efficiency. From 190 since 1820, according to World Bank data, by 2006, world GDP has grown to 66.6 trillion current international dollars, and 1820 of 694.4 billion yuan in 1990, compared to the international increase of up to 94.9 times the cumulative, net 1990 to 2006 international dollars roughly 35% of the depreciation of the existence of factors, the cumulative terms of constant prices should be close to 70 times the actual increase. At the same time, the world's total population growth to 65.2 million, an increase of only 5.26 times total. Considering the average life expectancy of the world's population to this has been extended to nearly 68 years, the corresponding increase of the world's total labor force of 9.6 times, from 4.4 billion to 4.22 billion people. Obviously, this period, growth in the labor force growth on the role of wealth began to lose its place is a rapid increase in labor efficiency. General situation is that labor force growth due to the wealth of contributions to growth of about 14% of total wealth growth, improve labor efficiency due to the wealth of contributions to growth of about 86% of total wealth growth.

Since the complex to enhance work efficiency of labor growth is the main source of income growth, develop skills and complex work is the result of education, on this stage is the result of higher education, therefore, "Employment is the Thing in People "This statement is definitely wrong. Correct to say of course, is: "Education is Basic Thing."

Unfortunately, China's gross enrollment rate of students (enrollment in regular higher education / school-age population) less than 30%, of which only 21.8% in 2006, while the U.S. was 81.8%, Australia 72.7%, Korea 91 %, even more than 47% in Mongolia.

To this end, my suggestion is that as soon as domestic students should be gross enrollment rates to 50%. Generally speaking, this means that the domestic general higher education in the number of students on the basis of the current 20 million to 35 million ~ 40 million. Considering the number of national school-age decreasing year by year, to maintain the scale, 10 years or more after some time domestic students will be able to improve gross enrollment rate to 70%.

As to how the rapid increase in domestic gross enrollment rate of students? The answer of course is to increase funding for higher education investment. However, not increase the population's education investment, or increase the commercialization of educational inputs, but to increase the Government's educational investment. The sustained and rapid economic growth and huge debt the central government and space, the Chinese government can handle. On second thought, since the ability to value the RMB 6 trillion of foreign exchange reserves over to the Americans to spend, they have the ability to run higher education in China.

Incidentally, the last decade the commercialization of higher domestic traveled road is very wrong. This not only increased the parents, especially in rural financial burden on parents, also resulted in the University of heavily indebted, and made even the professors who pay no medical treatment. Think about it, since banks have a problem the government needs assistance, then what the University of liabilities back to teachers and parents own it! This is very unfair.

It is worth mentioning that the Government increase investment to higher education is not the way ticket. The immediate benefits, the investment in education is also a domestic demand, increasing investment in education is to expand domestic demand, thus achieving revenue growth with income growth, not to mention the latter increase is often greater than the former. The long-term benefits, raising the gross enrollment rate of college students can contribute to upgrading of domestic industries, the focus on further enhancing the secondary industry and tertiary industry the proportion of non-agricultural population and the proportion of the total population, in the first industry revenue contribution rate is negative, and the current financial revenue almost entirely from one-third of the total population of non-agricultural population (urban population, which still includes a large number of agricultural population), which will surely become an important revenue promoter of sustainable growth .

Although I am not deputies, but for me, I will "gross enrollment rate of students rapidly increased," the two sessions at this year's proposal.

Relations between the real estate from the variable impact on the economy

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

-Action: The Relationship between variables influence on the economy of real estate

No matter what is in favor of or opposed to what should be reasonable, be logically correct, factually correct.

What is the relationship between variables? Variable relations in mathematics, also known as topology, that is an object of continuous deformation in space and time attached to the relationship between different variables. On the macro-economic terms, is to observe the major variables that affect the GDP, analysis of these variables and the relationship between GDP growth.

Let's look at the situation in 2008. 2008 GDP growth of 9.6%, down sharply over the 3.4 percent growth rate. Growth factor specific to the investment in fixed assets rose 25.5%, 0.7 percentage points over the previous year; the growth of total social retail 21.6%, 4.8 percentage points over the previous year; exports grew 7.24%, an increase of 13.21 percent over the previous year down . Only from these variables, it seems that lead to economic slowdown is mainly due to the export slowdown, or by the financial crisis.

However, if the notes in 2008 annual sales of new homes fell by 34.92 percent, while an increase of 13.5% over the previous year; noted that in 2008 the newly built commercial housing sales, declining by 19.5%, while an increase of 42.1% over the previous year; noted that the central bank had previously illogical personal mortgage interest rates significantly increased to 8.61%, it is not difficult to draw conclusions: in 2008 China's economic slowdown led to the real reason is that real estate over-tightening policy in a substantial decline.

Look at the situation again in 2009. 2009 GDP growth of 8.7%, down 0.9 percentage points over the previous year; fixed asset investment grew 30.1%, 4.6 percentage points over the previous year to speed up; social retail sales grew 15.5%, down 6.1 percentage points over the previous year; exports -16% , down 23.24 percentage points over the previous year; but only 82.8% of sales of commercial property (in 2009 4.4 trillion, in 2008 2.41 trillion), second-hand housing sales increase of more than 200% is.

For whom, we can not deny that real estate in today's pillar industry of China's economic role, unless he is a nerd, is subjective dogmatist, or ignorance, and emotional elements. My words are strong enough, but the character dictates, can not be changed. What men say, of course, sonorous, powerful, can not be submissive.

Why real estate is a pillar industry

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

Ching Yee: Why real estate is a pillar industry of China

What kind of real estate industry? What is so important to China's economic significance, and it really is not a pillar industry of China's economy?

For a long time around these problems, all controversial. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in a report two years ago to openly oppose the views of the real estate as a pillar industry and has remained the same. In the long ago, chief economist of the National Unification Council is certainly a high profile real estate industry as a pillar of China's economic role.

Little attention, is not difficult to find these are the pros and cons from the real estate investment compared to the proportion of investment in fixed assets to define its importance. This is certainly a very one-sided, it can be said is wrong to grandma house.

Some people saw in the real estate industry on the iron and steel, building materials, chemicals, textiles, home appliances and other industries driving force of the final analysis, only circumstantial evidence only, not as a sign of recognition pillar industries.

Many times previously on many occasions to participate in the real estate seminar experience, I found many, including scholars, including even the real estate industry, what should be classified in which all carry her clear.

It is certain that, although the output is the direct contribution of land, but real estate is certainly not the first industry; Although the house is built out, but the output of home building and construction industry has statistics which can not be the second measurement, so Real estate is certainly not the secondary industry.

In fact, the nature of the real estate industry is not complicated. Since the industry to sell the land and the main house, so real estate can only belong to the tertiary industry. These include three levels, one level of land development and land transfer, and second, the two land development and new housing sales, third, second-hand housing sales.

This makes the real estate industry's GDP statistics can be accurately. On second thought, that can not have accurate statistics on gross domestic product in the field can not be considered a separate industry.

GDP for the statistics of real estate, we must first clear their financial flows. According to official disclosure of the data, in 2009, total national land transfer 1.5 trillion yuan, 4.4 trillion yuan newly built commercial housing sales. Both the data is clear, as sales of second homes, so far can not find national statistics totals. However, I would like to remind you that, if you do not know that second-hand housing sales, the importance of judgments relating to real estate are very inaccurate. Fortunately, this is to be projected.

According to Beijing Municipal Statistics, 2009, second-hand housing sales total 0.71 trillion yuan. Based on data provided by the National Unification Council, Beijing nearly three years of the new commercial housing sales accounting for 8.56% total number, or the National total sales of newly built commercial houses in Beijing's 11.68 times. This of course can be used as a reference to second-hand data. By inference, the national second-hand housing sales in 2009 should be about 8.29 trillion yuan.

The three levels of domestic economic flow of real estate in 2009 was 14.19 trillion yuan total, equivalent to the domestic retail sales in 2008 to 1.3 times the 2008 total sales of 6.16 times that of steel. Only from this perspective, the first issue of real estate as a pillar industry, no doubt.

However, since the flow rate of the GDP is the different nature of the two indicators, which only the former were less after the transfer of Value or Value into the wealth of added value. Therefore, the real estate market economic flow on the ratio of GDP to measure the importance of their industry, in theory is not accurate enough.

In accordance with the income approach, GDP, land transfer net of government which is GDP, land development which is paid to the amount of compensation in demolition most of GDP, the two combined to account for a large land transfer flow 90%. New commercial housing sales in the operating surplus which is GDP, some of which to pay taxes on behalf of the Government, as part owner of net profits, with sales of newly built commercial housing were paid to reward employees posed by the GDP, of which at least 30 % of GDP. Be noted that sales of newly built commercial housing costs among the land, as land transfer previous years, statistics have been done in previous years, coupled with its own input nature, therefore, not as the year's GDP output. As for the second-hand housing sales, is greater than the cost of spending part of their course GDP, and as property income, household income statistics in which urban residents. It is noteworthy that in 2009 the second-hand housing sales, profitability and more than 50% to 70%, the average should be no less than 60%.

Having said that, in 2009 the GDP contribution of the domestic real estate should be about 7.64 trillion yuan, of which land transfer link for the 1.35 trillion yuan, the new sales of commercial links for the 1.32 trillion yuan, second-hand housing sales link for the 4.97 trillion yuan , together accounting for 23% of the proportion of GDP.

So, even if 40% of the total contribution rate of GDP in 2008, 10.85 trillion yuan of total retail sales of the whole society, but the contribution to GDP was 4.3 trillion yuan, while the GDP contribution of the steel industry was only 0.92 trillion yuan.

It would appear that the real estate industry as a pillar of China's economy, but also controversial you!

Given China's industrialization and urbanization target not yet reached, in accordance with common international standards probably be achieved only in half, so that should not be considered as a pillar industry of real estate point of view, pure nonsense system.

Furthermore, the property of the government revenue higher contribution rate as an important source of transfer payments, but also narrow the gap between rich and poor, the main support. So, that accused the real estate industry as a pillar of the national tragedy can only say, is quite ignorant, and too tragic.

Incidentally, since the real estate As China's economy is so important, property stocks not worth the attention you stumped!

Is the fruit of reform is due to people's livelihood

Thursday, November 1st, 2007

Ching Yee: Reform is a result of
People's livelihood is the fruit

All political, in the final analysis services are for people's livelihood. But for the people's livelihood, the most pertinent is the reform. This is also the prosperity of the period in Chinese history are inextricably linked with the reform of the truth lies.

Han Wenjing, because the ruling authorities to vigorously promote the population and fiscal policy reform, the main line is to encourage growth, has kept taxes low, only 39 years, not only bid farewell to the late Qin and war and the ravages of the Huns invade people's livelihood, and created the first Chinese history in the true sense of peace and prosperity. In a sense, after the emperor in the writing, and the harmonization of axle weights and measures and other aspects of the radical type of reform is the basic achievements of the Western Han Dynasty Prime factors.

The Tang Dynasty so, in fact, refers to the early 8th century AD, Kaiyuan Prosperity. Similarly, if there is no previous mid-7th century AD, during the Rule, there can be no Golden Age Kaiyuan. In addition to minimal tax burden, the Golden Years of reforms focused on administrative structure, personnel, education, justice and foreign affairs, created a whole set of effective governance system, and most of the present day.

Ming Ren Xuan governance, reform focused on punishment of official corruption, which means the cruel, indeed unprecedented. Since then, government, honest, people thought ahead, and big Ming Dynasty through the highly developed and prosperous trade in handicrafts to the world largest economy, has laid a solid foundation.

30 years of reform and opening up, economic growth of China can not ignore that the rapid. However, it comes to people's livelihood, then poured forth a wide range of issues, such as widening income gap between urban and rural areas, migrant workers by sex-starved, Students Employment, urban water shortages in summer and winter gas shortage, air pollution, traffic congestion, serious native population and dwelling, house slaves and slave children, as well as medical treatment is difficult, school choice so difficult. This makes China's rapid economic growth of only a few people rich, not benefit the public's livelihood.

To a large extent, economic growth can not benefit the livelihood of the crucial, is further and further slow the pace of reform.

For example, the financial system is not reformed, with the deficit snowballed where the rapid growth of not only local government in promoting local economic growth by binding the hands and feet, infrastructure, shortage of the situation intensified, and the banking system Yezai local government borrowing drag violation Under the new non-performing loans into the trap, so that credit expansion is not sustainable, capacity can not effectively use, economic growth and between unemployment and hidden unemployment can not be resolved the conflict.

For example, the exchange rate reform, not radical change in net domestic foreign exchange market, the central bank continued to buy foreign exchange reserves and the Foreign Exchange Reserves swelling so the status of the RMB exchange rate rigidity is small, it is important that the monetary policy tightening can not be sustained out of the error. Analysis shows that the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism, the central bank liabilities, continued rapid expansion and tightening monetary policy, the number one promoter.

Another example of land reform, if not open all the agricultural land market restrictions, widen the channels of property income of farmers, expected to increase the transfer of central government expenditure and farmers through the city working to narrow the income gap between urban and rural areas is almost impossible. Data show that, including rental income and profits to sell second-hand access to the property, including income, income of urban residents is the rapid growth in recent years, one of the reasons, is growing income gap between urban and rural residents an important reason.

Accordingly, do not accelerate the pace of the second housing reform, the majority of urban low-income housing could only look disappointed, and residential areas of polarization will be heated and dwelling house slaves of young people and can only grow.

By inference, if not as soon as family planning policy reforms, changes strictly limited population growth in order to encourage moderate population growth, and education, raising the cost of health care reform to reduce the population in another 60 years, they may catch up with U.S. population China. Prior to this, with the total population of the elderly population in particular, raising the cost of maintenance costs continue to rise, to 2028, China's economic growth will exist into zero or even negative growth in the long cycle. This means that China will be lost once again become the world's number one economic power of the historic opportunity.

Nothing more than "the current government reform task has been completed," this rumor is even more disappointing. Nothing too personal factors for leaders of the slow pace of reform is even more distressing.

History tells us that reform is due to people's livelihood is a fruit. Lip every day to people's livelihood, rhetoric, to please the people, in the end the people's livelihood is empty. Only speed up the reform, the general public to become the main beneficiaries of economic growth. Words, people's livelihood is true, the reform is real.

Leverage high prices in the industrialized

Saturday, September 8th, 2007

-Action: High house prices in the industrialized lever

National Unification Council to disclose the latest data show that in 2009 the acquisition of domestic real estate development company land area shrink by 18.9%, 19.9% decline to complete the development area, housing area and completed the construction area grew by 12.8% and 5.5%, while sales surged 42.1% area , in which area home sales increase 80% ... ...

More extreme imbalance between supply and demand data, the trend indicates this year's prices are still strong, despite the recent significant price decline of individual cities.

After rising sharply last year, the national average commercial housing price (sales / marketing area) from 3,877 yuan per square meter the previous year rose to 4,695 yuan. Should be said, compared to 2008 disposable income of urban families 16,000 yuan, it is indeed a very high levels. Sensibility that now used in Beijing to sell a house, enough to buy a nice villa the United States, in Italy, bought several acres of farmland with several farm homes.

However, even though I oppose the price is too high, but from another perspective, the high price is not necessarily a bad thing.

In the previous article, I have mentioned, the land of output efficiency, the so-called industrialization, is actually a continuous process of improving land productivity and efficiency, and continuously reduce non-agricultural land, agricultural land and output efficiency gap process, or urban-rural income gap smaller and smaller process (worse, the last 15 years, the domestic income gap between urban and rural areas are not getting smaller and smaller, but growing. Now the gap than even the founding of the beginning of even more than before liberation large). Almost all countries the process of industrialization, rising house prices in the city are subject to progressive, high prices and low there's imbalance. Extended a little further, it is said that the industrialization of high prices is the lever.

The difference is, with most of the countries traversed the road of industrialization than the current high prices of the industrialization process of China's high leverage is unprecedented. This determines that China can take advantage of high prices to speed up the process of industrialization. In Beijing, every now sold a house as large as 2 million yuan output value can be achieved, including at least 70% or 130 million, an increase in value, or 50% of revenue and 20% of the operating surplus. Given prices comparable to first-tier cities in China's richest countries, while peasant incomes comparable to the poorest countries (this is the great irony of China's industrialization), the Government can Liyong huge gains from the real estate market, in efforts to narrow the income gap between urban and rural areas, while accelerating economic growth.

Another important difference is that most of the industrialized countries with high rates of leverage through private ownership of land or a disguised private, and private investment in this pathway. The Chinese government monopoly of the land, decided that only the government can achieve this leverage.

Unfortunately, so far, the Government has not yet aware of the high prices is to the industrialization of the leverage effect, despite years of government revenue increasing reliance on real estate market, including the rapid rise of the land transfer proceeds as well as various aspects of the flow tax, income tax.

Correct approach is that the Government should take full advantage of high prices to speed up the efficiency of conversion of land, and take full advantage of rapid growth of the land revenue to further promote the conversion. As a result, not only meet the increasing domestic demand for residents, the release of the growth potential of domestic demand, more importantly, you can narrow the income gap between urban and rural areas, and thus achieve sustainable economic development.

What I mean is that given the high rates of industrialization, the lever, the Chinese economy is not healthy growth, urban-rural income gap can not be quickly reduced, it is the Government's capacity problems.